Wednesday, December 15, 2004

Mum 'killed baby with drug'

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/printpage/0,5481,11704282,00.html

Herald Sun
16 December 2004

Mum 'killed baby with drug'
By Annabelle McDonald and Megan Saunders

A mother was yesterday charged with murder after she allegedly gave her four-year-old daughter a fatal dose of methadone, just months after the NSW Department of Community Services learned the child had suffered a cardiac arrest after a similar incident but failed to act.

Margaret Jalaty, a 32-year-old unemployed woman from Revesby in Sydney's southwest, appeared in Burwood Local Court yesterday afternoon after being arrested by Bankstown detectives earlier in the day. She was refused bail.

Ms Jalaty allegedly administered the lethal dose to her daughter, Alia Maarbani, in November 2003, the court was told. In a statement of facts tendered to the court, police alleged she drugged her child to allow her to have sex with a lover in peace.

The statement also alleged "the deceased child had been presented in a critical condition to the Sydney Children's Hospital on a previous occasion in August 2003 with methadone poisoning after having suffered a cardiac arrest".

"This incident was investigated by DOCS who failed to notify the police," the statement said, adding that DOCS had been told at the time the methadone dose had been accidentally ingested by the child.

A DOCS spokeswoman last night confirmed the department had been working with Ms Jalaty and her daughter since 1999.

The statement of facts claimed that on November 22 last year Ms Jalaty went to Bankstown McDonald's to meet "a male acquaintance she had previously corresponded with on a chat line".

"The accused escorted the male to her home where she intended to entertain him but couldn't as the victim would not go to sleep. After several hours of attempting to put the victim to sleep, the victim was taken to her room where she slept," it said.

Ms Jalaty will next appear on January 19 in Burwood Local Court for a mention via videolink.

The case comes as the six-year-old girl at the centre of another incident involving DOCS was removed from the care of her mother to be placed in a foster home.

The young girl's plight grabbed national attention last week after a NSW Ombudsman's report raised concerns about the way DOCS had responded to the case involving the girl and her brother, 3.

Police and coronial investigations are under way into the death of the boy who was left with his sister in the care of two men known to police as sex offenders.

Two days before the boy's death in September 2003, one of the men videotaped himself raping the girl. The man, William Thomas Clare, was sentenced in October to 16 years' jail for the crime.

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,11704282%5E421,00.html

Life expectancy: Married men catch up with women

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/printpage/0,5942,11702152,00.html

The Australian
16 December 2004

Married men catch up with women
By Natasha Robinson

They have consistently trailed behind women in life expectancy, but men are slowly but surely narrowing the gap - provided they are married.

Over the past 20 years, men have increased their lifespan by six years to an average age of 78, while women's life expectancy has improved by four years to 83.

The figures released yesterday by the Australian Bureau of Statistics show a huge difference between the death rates of married people against those who have never married, with single people almost twice as likely to die in any given year than their married counterparts.

But the statistical picture of longevity is radically different for Aborigines, with indigenous men dying almost 20 years earlier than non-Aboriginal men. An Aboriginal man can expect to live only to 58 years, while Aboriginal women live to an average of 65 years.

Men remain at significantly higher risk than women of committing suicide - and the outlook for Aboriginal men is particularly bleak.

Despite the rate of male suicide falling to its lowest point in a decade - a trend hailed as a victory by depression awareness advocates - men were still four times more likely than women to kill themselves.

The Northern Territory has a suicide rate 77 per cent higher than the rest of Australia, reflecting the higher suicide rate among the indigenous population there.

Beyondblue, the depression advocacy group, said the declining suicide rate, particularly among teenagers, was partly the result of the growing public awareness about major suicide risk factors such as depression.

"People are more likely to talk about issues than they used to be, so the stigma is reducing," said deputy chief executive Nicole Highett.

"As a result of reducing the stigma and increasing awareness, people are more likely to ultimately look at getting treatment," Dr Highett said.

The gains in life expectancy put Australians among the longest-living adults in the world, with only Hong Kong Chinese, Japanese and Swedes living longer.

State by state, Canberrans live the longest, at 79.4 years for men, while the Northern Territory registered the lowest life expectancy, at 68.2 years for men.

Outer Adelaide and Perth were next in line for the highest longevity, while men in Sydney and Melbourne could also expect to live longer.

Babies are less at risk of dying than ever before, with a drop of 50 per cent in the infant mortality from 1987 to the present day.

Cancer was the biggest killer, accounting for 28 per cent of all deaths across the nation in 2002. But despite this, overall deaths from cancer have fallen by 10 per cent in the past 10 years.

Aborigines are less likely to die of cancer, with a rate significantly below that of the non-Aboriginal population at 15 per cent of deaths.


http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,11702152^2702,00.html

Monday, December 13, 2004

Health: Men who remarry "stop trying"

http://www.manchesteronline.co.uk/news/s/140/140111_men_who_remarry_stop_trying.html

Manchester Online
14 December 2004

Men who remarry "stop trying"

Men who remarry rather than staying widowed or divorced seem to stop trying, putting on weight and taking less exercise, researchers said today.

Despite their expanding waistlines and more sedentary lifestyle, remarried men appeared to improve their diet with more vegetables and less alcohol, according to the study.

But divorce or the death of a wife had the worst effect on diet and drinking habits, according to the study in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

It confirmed past suggestions that attached men enjoy better health and well-being in the long-term than those who remain single.

The research, involving 40,000 people taking part in a long-term study on chronic illness, looked at the diets and lifestyle of divorced, separated, married and re-married men from 1986.

The researchers found that compared to men who remained widowed or divorced, those who remarried put on weight and cut down on exercise.

The team, from Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, said this could be due to increased time demands stopping them taking exercise, while regular meal patterns and social events may lead to increased food intake.

But the contents of their diet did improve, with more vegetables, lean poultry and less sugary drinks.

Alcohol

Compared to men who stayed married, those who were widowed increased their alcohol consumption and ate less vegetables.

The break-up of a marriage was also linked to weight-loss.

"Divorced men were most likely to smoke and drank more alcohol, but were more active," the researchers said.

"In terms of diet, married men consumed more fruits and vegetables."

They added: "Marital termination may have an impact on health by adversely affecting a range of health and dietary behaviours in men.

"Clinicians and other health professionals should be attentive to marital transitions in their patients' lives as they could change diet and other health behaviours."


The Scariest Book

http://http://menstuff.org/columns/wilson/current.html

Men's Stuff
13 Decembeer 2004

The Scariest Book
By KC Wilson

In 1995, Christina Hoff Sommers published Who Stole Feminism: How Women Have Betrayed Women. It remains the most frightening book since Huxley's Brave New World and should be required reading in every highschool, just as the other was in my day. We'll only know the danger has passed when it is.

What distinguishes Who Stole Feminism from previous books that looked at where we're headed is what makes it even more frightening. It's not fiction. It's five years of thorough research that reports what is happening now.

Christina Hoff Sommers is a scholar in moral theory at Clark University, Boston, and active in human rights for decades. She also still calls herself a feminist, identifying with it from when it stood for social progress and before it became the reactionary force of today. To distinguish the two she calls herself and those still committed to fairness, "equity feminists" (as in social equality), and what took over feminism in the 1980s, "gender feminists" (women first and only).

On one hand are the numerous assertions of female victimization she investigates that have been used to control the public with fear: rule of thumb, girls short-changed in education, low female teen self-esteem, domestic violence, 1 in 4 college girls raped, backlash, Abuse Bowel, and even anorexia. We follow her adventures in discovering their origins, then the experts and studies that show that the truth is very different from these popular social myths.

It is a powerful lesson in how we, the public, are easily controlled with emotion. Push the right buttons and facts loose all meaning. Emotional and moral bullying are more effective than reason, even better than physical intimidation.

But more important and more startling is what she knows from inside both the women's movement and academia.

Sommers takes us to conferences of feminist scholars where the focus is to be evangelically "engaged and enraged," whether there's anything to be enraged about or not. To Women's Studies classes whose purpose, according to Prof. Joyce Trebilcot, is "persuading students that women are oppressed" so they have something to be enraged about, and where the professor-recruiter identifies with her gender, not as an individual member of humanity.

From Alison Jaggar's, "the old ideals of freedom, equality, and democracy are insufficient," to Kate Millett defining everything as Sexual Politics, to Marilyn Friedman insisting that the majority of women's opinions on everything, when different from hers, should be ignored as patriarchally forced. It seems women can't think for themselves. These women really believe this and are given wide scope. Even non-feminists accept much of it as credible.

Is this extreme left wing or right?

This is not some rag-tag fringe group. The above quoted women and their sisters are professors and politically ambitious, whose rally-conferences are sponsored by major foundations. They ensure new faculty applicants are asked, "How has feminist scholarship effected your work?", target all social, scientific, academic, and economic life and do very well at it.

For instance, the "transformation [of curriculum] movement," underway at all levels of education, says that if 5% of historical figures are women, 50% of those studied must be women and treated as though they had the same impact as men. Because, as Elizabeth Fee says, "Knowledge was created as an act of aggression."

Did you know that about knowledge? Again, this is not some fringe group. They are mainstream and generally supported. What is happening at your child's school?

Who Stole Feminism is an important study of how any social movement that sees dominance in others can only seek it for themself. It will remain a classic for future generations.

If not, no one stopped them.

---

K.C. Wilson is the author of "Male Nurturing," "The Multiple Scandals of Child Support," and other ebooks on family and men's issues.
http://wheres-daddy.com

Joint Custody: Israel Reviews Fathers Custody Rights

http://www.israelnewsagency.com/israelfatherscustodyrightschildren84442129.html

Israel News Agency
9 December 2004

Israel Reviews Fathers Custody Rights
By Joel Leyden
Jerusalem

The Israel Ministry of Health and the Israel Ministry of Justice are now taking a hard, serious look at the benefits of joint custody in the Jewish state. Joint custody might very well be the best option for children of separation and divorce, an American family psychology study found.

Trekking from Mom's home during the week to Dad's on the weekend may seem like a hassle for some children of divorced parents, but it just might be best for them in the long run, concludes a meta-analysis, published in the March Journal of Family Psychology (Vol. 16, No. 1).

The study finds that children from divorced families are better adjusted when they live with both parents at different homes or spend significant time with both parents compared with children who interact with only one parent.

Robert Bauserman, PhD, of the Baltimore Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, reviewed 33 studies that examined 1,846 sole-custody and 814 joint-custody children. Both groups of children were compared with a sample of 251 kids in intact families. Bauserman found that children in joint-custody arrangements had fewer behavioral and emotional problems, higher self-esteem and better family relationships and school performance compared with those in sole-custody situations.

And he found no significant difference in adjustment among children in shared custody and those living in intact family situations. Joint-custody children probably fare better, according to Bauserman, because they have ongoing contact with both parents. The contact with both parents, he argues, is the key ingredient in kids' adjustment, he said.

The findings indicate that children don't necessarily need to be in joint physical custody to show better adjustment, they just need to spend substantial time with both parents. Also, according to the research, couples with joint-custody agreements tend to experience less conflict - which speaks to the concern that joint custody is harmful to kids because it exposes them to ongoing parental strife.

In fact, Bauserman notes, "it was the sole-custody parents who reported higher levels of current conflict." He found that some research shows that joint custody may actually reduce parental conflict over time. Obviously, joint custody isn't always preferable to sole custody. When one parent is abusive or neglectful sole custody could be the best option for the children, Bauserman says.

The Israel Association for Father's Rights supports the above study as well as other human rights groups based in Israel. The Israel Association for Father's Rights (IAFR) has over 80,000 members, a large and professional staff of social workers and family attorneys. The IAFR, which is based in Tel Aviv, works closely with the Israel Ministry of Health, the Israel Ministry of Justice and the Association for Civil Rights in Israel.

The Israel Association for Father's Rights has been at the legal and ethical forefront fighting against parental abuse by mothers, the legal and callous use of children as pawns in divorce cases, abusive child support (mezonote) decisons, false claims of sexual harassment and the basic human right of full and joint custody for fathers.

---

Related news site: http://www.cbc.ca/cp/world/041207/w120728.html

Related Web site: http://www.fathers-4-justice.org/

Sunday, December 12, 2004

Cheating Wives: Women and Infidelity

http://my.webmd.com/content/article/90/100725.htm

WebMD Health
12 July 2004

Cheating Wives: Women and Infidelity

Can this marriage be saved? Maybe, maybe not.
Think twice or three times before leaping into another guy's arms.

By Jeanie Lerche Davis

Reviewed By Brunilda Nazario, MD

The affair: Maybe you've considered it. Maybe you're in it. Today's women are acting on the urge, more than ever before, a new survey reveals.

One in five married women has had a fling - the highest numbers ever recorded, according to one group of researchers. In fact, the numbers of cheating wives now equals the statistics on cheating husbands, according to a study by Tom W. Smith with the National Opinion Research Center.

In these Sex and the City days, that's hardly startling. "Society has given women permission to be sexually active, and it's perfectly clear why women do it ... it's for the same reasons men do. They're not getting what they want out of their marriage," says David Kaplan, PhD, a marriage counselor with 15 years under his belt, and now a spokesperson for the American Counseling Association.

The workplace, working out, the Internet - women have more sexual opportunities than ever before. With better salaries and no children, the stakes seem low if they are caught.

Readers Tell Their Stories

For more insights, we asked WebMD readers about their indiscretions. Here's what some shared:

"My ex-wife cheated and left me for her boss," writes one male. "I took part of the blame myself. To be fair, I didn't pay her enough attention or affection. Though I didn't know why at the time, I was very closed off and introverted. I don't think I knew how to be in a good relationship."

A woman writes: "Yes, I have cheated. I am not proud of it, but I got married young and hubby wasn't paying any attention to me. I worked 12-hour days to come home every night to be by myself. The morning came when he went to work and I left for three days. Can't say I had a miserable time but now that I have kids, I wouldn't do it again. We went to counseling and now are happy with two kids."

Another woman shares her story: "I have been the "other woman" for a married man. We used to meet almost every day while she was at work and we would just walk around the park where no one would know. One day ... he told me he had fallen in love with me. ... It remained sexual for about four months. I finally ended the relationship. I felt guilty lying to his wife ... and I wanted a real relationship."

What Married Women Want

For some cheating wives, the affair is truly all about sex, says Nadine Kaslow, PhD, a family counselor and psychologist at Emory University School of Medicine.

"When they were dating, there was passion, they want that passion back. If they're physically attracted to someone else, they may act on it," she tells WebMD.

Not that every woman is unfaithful, says Kaslow. "Certainly many women have affairs. But many, many don't. When you wait to get married when you're older and more mature, you make a better choice of the appropriate person, and you may be more engaged in the relationship."

Also, not all affairs are flings, she points out. "Sometimes people develop an emotional connection, an emotional affair, rather than something sexual."

For most women, an inattentive husband is indeed the biggest problem. His "affair" with his work or some other passion like sports may turn her into a cheating wife. "She doesn't feel valued, respected, she's not treated nicely, she feels taken for granted. If she finds someone who helps them feel good about themselves, who does those small things, says the right things, it's very seductive, very appealing," Kaslow explains.

A married couple's views of their roles may clash: He wants a "traditional" she-cooks-dinner marriage. She prefers the gym after a stressful workday - not the kitchen. Both styles of marriage can work. "What makes the difference is whether they're in sync or not. When that's not resolved, it's likely someone will be frustrated," says Kaplan.

Their emotional relationship can also be problematic. If they're joined-at-the-hip constantly, they may be smothering each other's identity. If they are too "distant" and independent, they will likely seek a bond with someone else, he adds.

In fact, all couples have problems, Kaplan says. But couples who have warm, supportive feelings for each other - and express those feelings - will stay married.

One large study looked at this issue. "Researchers thought they would find those who wanted divorce had more problems," he says. "But that was not true. All the couples had problems. The difference was the number of positive statements they made about each other."

The happy couples said many more positive statements than negative ones to each other, says Kaplan. "Unhappy couples say more negative statements than positive. There's a very specific ratio - three positive things for one negative."

Can This Marriage Be Saved?

If your marriage is getting dusty and rusty - if another guy has caught your eye - think twice, three times, then think again before you act on it, advises Kaplan. "You need a marriage counselor, not an affair," he says.

Your "need" for an affair has nothing to do with that new guy, he says. "And it's not about sex, even though it may seem that it is. That person represents the needs that you want fulfilled. This is about problems in your marriage, what you're not getting from your marriage."

"Having an affair always has a negative affect on a marriage," says Kaslow. "It erodes trust, people feel betrayed. But it doesn't always mean they have to end the relationship. I have seen affairs become a painful wake-up call. It takes a long time to rebuild trust. I have seen couples get past affairs, but it's hard."

Of course, when children are involved, the priorities shift dramatically to them. "Those couples have a real responsibility to look at their problems, to look at what they're not getting in the marriage. It's a good time to get a marriage counselor involved," advises Kaplan.

Will your marriage weather an affair? "It makes a difference what kind of relationship you have," says Kaslow. "If the marriage is based on friendship, mutual respect, and caring, it can weather many problems. But after an affair, it's really hard to build that kind of foundation."

It may sound un-sexy, but relationships take work. "If couples don't actively work on their relationship, then they drift apart. One will seek attention elsewhere. It's a human need," Kaslow says.

The essence of "working on a relationship" is to talk more often - and more honestly, says Kaplan. "Unfortunately, couples often get stuck in a pattern ... a certain problem keeps coming up, and they are unable to solve it. Frustrated enough, they may look for someone they don't have that conflict with." That's where a marriage counselor can help, he adds.

While parents often say the kids don't know about the affair, they will know something's wrong, Kaslow tells WebMD. "There may not be a cold war, but there will be tension."

Their parents' bad relationship teaches kids negative patterns - even if they don't learn about an affair, she adds. "If there is disrespect or no passion or if parents don't communicate effectively, it increases the chances kids drawn to repeat that pattern. They have fewer strategies in working out problems, in getting their needs met."

If your marital problems have been ignored too long, the worse the prognosis for your marriage, says Kaplan. "We try desperately to get to people before they have an affair. An affair complicates things greatly. Then you're dealing with the lack of trust, the emotional repercussions."

Before you cross the line, realize that cheating wives gain nothing, he tells WebMD. If you're trying to send a wake-up call to your husband, an affair is not the way. "I've worked with innumerable couples, and not a single affair offered anything positive."

---

SOURCES: Smith, T., National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago, April 2003. David Kaplan, PhD, marriage counselor; spokesman, American Counseling Association. Nadine Kaslow, PhD, family counselor and psychologist, Emory University School of Medicine.

MANUMIT Links & Resources

Stephen Baskerville - Articles
http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/

New Zealand Equality Education Foundation - Peter Zohrab
http://equality.netfirms.com/index.html

Fathers On Rights for Custody Equality
http://www.force-la.com/

Abused Men's Area - Useful Resources
http://home.earthlink.net/~elnunes/abindex.htm

Fathering Magazine
http://www.fathermag.com/

Men's News Daily
http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/

Men's Activism
http://mensactivism.org/

ManRights Reference Desk
http://members.w-link.net/~parkertr/Introduction.htm

Fathers for Life (Walter Schneider)
http://www.fathersforlife.org/

International Men's Network
http://www.mens-network.org/

Mankind (UK)
http://www.mankind.org.uk/

UK Men's Movement
http://www.ukmm.org.uk/

Angry Harry
http://www.angryharry.com/
http://www.ihatefeminism.com/

Backlash!
http://www.backlash.com/

The Men's Issues Page
http://www.vix.com/men/

Dads Against the Divorce Industry
http://www.dadi.org/

American Coalition for Fathers and Children
http://www.acfc.org/

National Coalition of Free Men
http://www.ncfm.org/

National Congress for Fathers & Children
http://www.ncfc.net/

National Coalition of Free Men - Los Angeles
http://www.ncfmla.org/

The Memucan Institute of Men's Studies
http://www.mioms.com/

Amen Support Service for Male Victims of DV
http://www.amen.ie/

MenWeb Men's Voices Magazine
http://www.menweb.org/

Battered Men - The Hidden Side of Domestic Violence
http://www.batteredmen.com/

Dating Violence Against Men
http://www.datingviolence.org/

Stop Abuse For Everyone
http://www.safe4all.org/

Equal Justice Foundation
http://www.ejfi.org/

Domestic Violence Against Men (In Colorado)
http://www.dvmen.org/

Kid Culture in the Schools - Creating Gender-Friendly Schools
http://www.joemanthey.com/

Fathers are Capable Too
http://www.fact.on.ca/

Men's Resources Quebec (French)
http://lapresrupture.qc.ca/

Men's Defense Association
http://www.mensdefense.org/

Warren Farrell
http://www.warrenfarrell.com/

Jack Kammer
http://www.rulymob.com/

Armin Brott
http://www.mrdad.com/

Glenn Sacks
http://www.glennsacks.com/
http://www.hisside.com/

Nuance Journal
http://www.nuancejournal.com.au/

Stuart Birks' Gender Pages
http://www.massey.ac.nz/~kbirks/gender/gender.htm

Stuart Birks' Letters Pages
http://www.massey.ac.nz/~kbirks/gender/letters.htm

Men's Rights Agency
http://www.mensrights.com.au/

Dads on the Air
http://www.dadsontheair.com/

Shared Parenting Information Group
http://www.spig.info/

Shared Parenting Council of Australia
http://www.spca.org.au/

OzyDads
http://www.ozydads.net/

Lone Fathers Association Australia
http://www.lonefathers.com.au/

Australian Family Support Services Association
http://www.afssa.org.au/

Non-Custodial Parents Party
http://www.ncpp.xisle.info/

Tasmanian Men's Rights - Australia
http://www.geocities.com/christianj162000/

Blackshirts
http://www.blackshirts.info/

Fathers 4 Justice
http://www.fathers-4-justice.org/

Live Beat Dads UK
http://www.lbduk.org/

Shared Parenting: Washington Parenting Plan Law

Recently a question was asked about the Washington Parenting Act of 1987.

Oregon's Task Force on Family Law is also looking at the Washington way of doing things for a possible model.

Significantly, the words "custody" and "visitation" are used sparingly, and are instead replaced with terms like "residential schedule".

Problem is, the whores (lawyers, social workers, therapists, etc.) keep using the same old terms and doing it the same old way. The people are not vigilant.

Here's a piece from the Washington State Bar explaining that set of laws:

---

Citizen Rights Series

What you should know about the Parenting Act

Published in the public interest by the
Washington State Bar Association

THE PARENTING ACT OF 1987

Introduction

One of the most difficult parts of a marriage breakup is the effect it has on children. The Parenting Act of 1987, which went into effect on January 1,1988, attempts to help parents work out a legal arrangement for their children during and after a separation or dissolution.

The policy of the act is a radical change from prior law. Previous law provided that one parent was given the "care, control and custody of the children." Joint custody, although increasingly popular in some areas, produced much confusion.

Under the new law the policy is that the relationship of the child with each parent is to be changed after separation only to the extent required by the fact that the parents will reside in two households rather than one.

The Parenting Act, developed over a four-year period, replaces the terms child "custody" and "visitation" that are found in earlier laws about dissolution. The dissolution of a marriage does not dissolve the parent-child relationship. A child is no longer thought to be a "prize" or "property" awarded to one parent, with the "loser" allowed "visitation" privileges. Now, care of children is given to both parents.

The new law tries to address concerns of both mothers and fathers in allocating parental rights and responsibilities. This pamphlet explains the Parenting Act, and discusses some of the decisions that will have to be made on behalf of the children.

To whom does the Parenting Act apply?

The Parenting Act applies to parents who are married and who are going through or who have gone through a dissolution or legal separation. It applies even if the dissolution is not being contested. For unmarried parents, some of the same concepts involved in a parenting plan may apply, but the situation is different, so an attorney should be consulted.

What Is the Parenting Act?

The new Parenting Act revises child custody laws. In fact, this new law does not use the words "custody" and "visitation." Instead, it refers to a parenting plan, "parenting functions" and "residential schedules." Even though the terms differ, the ideas are similar.

A parenting plan is a court-approved, written arrangement that is worked out between parents or decided by a judge if the parents cannot agree on its terms. It is a legal document now required in Washington for any annulment, legal separation or marital dissolution proceeding where minor children are involved.

The parenting plan has several parts, including sections on residential provisions, decision-making functions, dispute resolution procedures and limitations.

The residential schedule states where the child(ren) will live and what contact they will have with each parent. The decision-making section states who (mother, father or both parents) will make major decisions about concerns like the child's education, health care or religion. The dispute resolution provisions outline a process for settling disagreements or problems without going back to court. A limitations section may be used to restrict contact by an abusive parent who could harm a child.

A child support section outlines financial arrangements. Other sections may include instructions, identification of the parents, children or other parties, and other provisions or special agreements.

What Is the purpose of the Parenting Act?

The new law looks to the present and future needs of children. It tries to define how to best meet their needs. It does so on a functional basis of "who does what," rather than the legal theory of "who has custody."

In general, the purposes of the Parenting Act are to specify the duties of each parent and to identify and try to resolve sources of conflict involving the children during the dissolution process.

The Parenting Act tries to reduce the harmful effects of separation and conflict on children by encouraging parents to keep their child's best interest in mind when working out a "parenting plan." This means trying to provide the most loving, stable and nurturing environment possible.

Some sections of the law may seem complex and too detailed. In part, this is to give flexibility to the parents and court so the plan can be adapted to each family. The Parenting Act recognizes it is important for the child to have a relationship with both parents after the marriage ends.

One important goal of the act is to preserve the parent-child interactions and relationships that exist at the time of the dissolution or separation. Other goals of the parenting plan are to:

1. provide for the child's physical care;

2. maintain the child's emotional stability;

3. provide for the changing needs of the child in a manner that minimizes the need to alter;

4. set forth the authority and responsibility of each parent with respect to the child;

5. minimize the child's exposure to harmful parental conflict;

6. encourage agreement between parents to meet their responsibilities without reliance on Judicial intervention; and

7. protect the best interest of the child.

Another goal of the Parenting Act is to set detailed guidelines and standards. In doing so, this law tries to help parents put together a specific plan for their family upon which they can rely - and, if necessary, enforce - in the future.

How Is a parenting plan made?

In developing a parenting plan, it is important to consider specific parenting functions and each parent's ability to:

1. maintain a loving, stable, consistent and nurturing relationship with the child;

2. attend to the daily needs of the child including feeding, clothing, physical care and grooming, supervision, health care day care and other needs as indicated by circumstances;

3. attend to adequate education, including remedial and other essential education that serves the best interests of the child;

4. assist the child to develop and maintain appropriate interpersonal relationships;

5. exercise good judgment regarding the child's welfare; and

6. provide for financial support of the child.

When these issues have been thoughtfully determined, you will need to work on the parenting plan's three ma"or elements: decision-making authority, the residential schedule, and the dispute resolution process.

1. Decision-making Authority. The Parenting Act requires parents to specify who may make major decisions about the child's care. Specific areas of concern are education, health care and religious upbringing; other items may also be specified.

Decisions about these issues may be made by both parents, be divided between them, or the parents may arrange that only one of them will make these decisions.

A court uses various factors in deciding whether both parents should share decision-making, or if only one of them should have this authority. These factors include how much the parents have participated in past decisions about their children, whether they can cooperate with one another in decision-making, and how far they live from one another.

Even though some major decisions may be designated to only one parent, it is important to remember that each parent may make decisions about day-to-day care and control of the child while that child is living with that parent. In an emergency, either parent may make decisions regarding their child's health or safety.

2. Residential Schedule. Parents will be asked to propose a living arrangement showing the amount of time each child will spend with each parent. Along with school days and weekends, this schedule considers occasions such as holidays, birthdays of family members and vacations. The schedule must be specific about these days and may not simply state "reasonable visitation." Transportation arrangements also may be considered.

The court will look for a residential schedule that maintains the most loving and stable relationship between each parent and child. It will favor giving the greatest amount of time to the parent who has been more involved in care for the child's daily needs, and whose relationship with the child is more stable and stronger.

The court also considers other factors, such as:

a. what agreements parents have arrived at regarding the residential schedule;

b. how well each parent has performed his or her parenting functions in the past, and their ability to do so in the future;

c. the child's relationships with brothers, sisters and other adults in his or her life;

d. how involved the child has become in his or her environment, including school and other activities; and

e. the wishes of the child (if old enough to express those wishes).

Although the court may permit a child to switch homes frequently,
such moving will be considered only under certain conditions:

a. if there has been a great deal of cooperation between parents in the past;

b. if there is reasonable geographic proximity; and

c. if the arrangement serves the best interest of the child.

In all cases, however, the children will live and spend time with each parent as designated by the plan, unless there is a serious problem with one parent.

3. Dispute Resolution Process. Conflicts may arise in the course of implementing the parenting plan. For example, parents may have disagreements about the plan itself or the care of children after a plan has been approved. Sometimes, these differences cannot be solved by sitting down and talking without help. Therefore, the Parenting Act includes a process in the plan to help clear up questions or resolve disputes.

The parents can decide which procedures to use, and they may even name a particular individual or agency to help them settle disputes. Also, they may use this dispute resolution process to make some changes in their plan.

Among options, parents may use counseling or mediation (a process where both parents meet with a third person to try to work out the problems together). Arbitration is also an option. This method involves a neutral third party, called an arbitrator, who listens to both sides and makes a decision.

Any other dispute settlement process agreed upon by the parents may be used.

Settling issues cooperatively outside of court is usually in the best interest of the children. In fact, only after using a dispute resolution procedure can the parents go to court. (Child support conflicts are one exception; these matters, and restrictions requested because of certain misconduct by parents, are usually settled by court action.) The parents retain the right to have dispute resolution decisions reviewed by superior court.

What happens to our child while I am going through my separation or dissolutlon?

The child's needs must, of course, continue to be met while parents are trying to settle marital differences. The Parenting Act calls for a "temporary parenting plan" to do just that. This replaces what used to be called "temporary custody."

A temporary parenting plan will operate only until a final parenting plan is worked out and approved by the court.

The temporary plan is the first step in the process of identifying and allocating the parents' responsibility and time with the child. It considers the child's needs, while allowing time for families to adjust to new circumstances.

Each parent may propose a temporary parenting plan. Then, in support of their plan, each makes a sworn, written statement (called an "affidavit"). This plan, which provides an initial outline of each parent's role in caring for the child, should address the following:

1. where and with whom the child has lived for the past 12 months;

2. to what extent each parent has taken care of the daily needs of the child for the past 12 months;

3. what each parent's work and child care schedules are now and for the past 12 months; and

4. whether any circumstances exist that might negatively affect the child if the child lives with or visits the other parent.

A permanent parenting plan replaces the custody-visitation order of a final decree. It is intended to provide a long-term formula for the parents' care and support of their child. If the parties reach an agreement on the final plan, a final order or decree must be signed by a judge, but not sooner than 90 days after filing and service.

The same form may be utilized for a temporary or permanent plan, but the court makes no presumptions from the provisions of a temporary plan.

Can there be any limitations to the plan?

While the Parenting Act tries to have both parents involved in the parenting of their children, there are circumstances when a parent's involvement can pose some risk to the child.

Limitations on a parent's involvement with a child may be made for certain reasons. For example, if either parent has abandoned their child for a long period of time or repeatedly refused to take part in caring for their daily needs, or physically, sexually, or emotionally abused the child, it may be possible to arrange restrictions. Serious acts of domestic violence can also cause the court to restrict or eliminate a parent's participation in the parenting plan.

There may be other cases where the court can limit or eliminate a parent's role in the parenting plan if doing so would be in the best interests of the child. Some examples are:

1. A parent has a long-term drug, alcohol or other substance abuse problem which has prevented that parent from taking care of the child's daily needs;

2. A parent has a long-term emotional or physical impairment that interferes with his or her taking care of the child;

3. There are little or no emotional ties between the child and parent;

4. The child's psychological development is in danger of being seriously damaged because a parent continues to be abusive or is a source of substantial conflict in the child's life;

5. One parent has not let the other see the child for a period of time without a good reason.

If one parent claims that the other parent has harmed the child, or would harm the child or the other parent, then this claim must be proved if denied.

Evidence to prove an allegation to the court includes your statements, the statements of others (witnesses), and documents, such as police or court records. The other parent may present evidence to the court to show that the abuse or the bad conduct did not occur or that such conduct did not affect the children, and should have no effect on the parenting plan.

How Is the plan enforced?

The law requires parents to deal in good faith. If they fail to do so, the violator could face civil or criminal charges. For example, if one parent fails or refuses to comply with the temporary or permanent parenting plan, or tries to stop the other parent from doing so, the court can enter an order preventing this parent from continuing such actions. Furthermore, the court can require the violator to pay court costs, attorney's fees or other charges as a penalty for not following the plan. Fines, or even jail terms (depending on the seriousness of the violation), also may be imposed.

The law specifically states that even if one parent violates the plan, the other parent must continue to perform his or her duties and take appropriate legal action to resolve the dispute. For example, one parent cannot restrict the other parent's residential time because child support payments are late.

Can a permanent parenting plan be changed?

A parenting plan can be changed in only a few cases. It may be changed if both parents agree to the change, and if it is in the best interests of the child.

If one parent does not agree to a proposed change, the court can modify a plan only if revisions are made necessary by a substantial change that has occurred in the child's life or in the lives of the parents since the parenting plan was ordered.

Any change in the plan must be in the best interests of the child. Similarly, the residential schedule can be modified if the court finds that the child's present living situation and environment are physically or emotionally harmful.

A word of caution

This pamphlet was prepared as a public service by the Washington State Bar Association. It provides general information about the Parenting Act and does not cover all aspects of your rights and responsibilities It is not intended to apply to any specific situation, nor is it a substitute for specific legal advice.

For more information on these subjects, see the State Bar pamphlets on "Dissolution" and "Lawyers and Legal Fees" (Please see back panel for ordering information) If you need advice or have questions about the application of the law in a particular matter, you should consult a lawyer.

Acknowledgments

This pamphlet is based on materials prepared as a cooperative effort by Evergreen Legal Services and Family Court Services, King County Superior Court. The information was adapted for this usage by the Washington State Bar Association, and is not reflective of the views of either agency. This pamphlet was prepared as a public service by the Washington State Bar Association to inform citizens of their legal rights and obligations. It contains general information and is not intended to apply to any specific situation.

Grandparents suffer in family splits

http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Grandparents-suffer-in-family-splits/2004/12/12/1102786955403.html

Sydney Morning Herald
13 December 2004

Grandparents suffer in family splits
By Michael Pelly

Grandparents who are concerned about the welfare of a child can do more harm than good by applying for a residence order, according to a study of the legal needs of older people.

The Law and Justice Foundation of NSW study also found that those who become involved in custody battles risk losing contact with their grandchildren and can spend up to $10,000 to win visiting rights. These family disputes represent about 25 per cent of all matters handled by Community Justice Centres across NSW, despite the reluctance of many grandparents to go down that path because it involves bringing an outsider into family issues. A large proportion of these cases are contact or access disputes.

According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, grandparents are the main providers of informal childcare but there is invariably a shift of this role during marriage breakdowns.

Submissions to the study told of grandparents being denied contact during power struggles between parents and of elderly couples separating under the strain of supporting their children through the courts.

Other grandparents found themselves left with small children after the Department of Community Services pleaded with them to assume the role of primary carer.

These grandparents can receive a non-parental care allowance, but find they are much worse off when they have to give up work to look after the children. There are also issues of contact with parents, which sometime have to be supervised.

The report says: "Ill-health, frailty and possibly disability combined with caring for children who have been through trauma, grief and anxiety about their own futures, make the relationship of care quite distinct from that of younger people in parenting relationships."

Prue Fairlie, of Grandparenting NSW, agrees that many are left with impossible tasks.

"I was talking to a woman the other day and she's 82 and looking after two small children. Their father and mother died from a drug overdose."

She questioned DOCS's assumption that kinship care is much better than foster care.

"When I look at the whole issue of sexual abuse, it has been shown that it is passed down through families. So if kids are moved away from sexual abuse in their families and placed with other members of the family, the likelihood is that some may be abused within that family as well."

The study says DOCS might withdraw from an investigation because of Family Court involvement and has a policy of not providing case management to children in kinship care.

One woman told the study: "I'm caring for my two grandchildren, aged 7 and 4. DOCS never checked me out or checked out the children. I called DOCS. They said the children were in family care, they were all right, they were safe. I said 'How do you know?'"

Now tummy monologues

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/12/12/1102786951873.html

Sydney Morning Herald
13 December 2004

Now tummy monologues

Just when she learned to love one body part, playwright Eve Ensler started to hate another. And that, says the author of the international hit The Vagina Monologues, is how she came to write The Good Body.

In the play, Ensler alternately appears as herself, speaking directly to the audience about her obsession with her flabby stomach, and plays roles ranging from Isabella Rossellini to an old Kenyan woman, a Hispanic woman worried about "the spread" and an Italian who undergoes mastectomies hoping to avoid abuse by an older man.

"I said the word vagina, vagina, vagina a million times," Ensler comments in the new play. "I thought I was home free. I had finally come to like my vagina. Until one day I realised the self-hatred had just crept up into my stomach."

The Good Body opened recently on Broadway. It has been faulted by some critics as returning to well-worn themes, but in a way that raises laughs.

"Many, many women have issues with their bodies. I don't think it's something that's gone away ... it's actually escalated," Ensler said in an interview.

Advertisement
Advertisement"I started thinking about it because I have body issues I was obsessed by and surprised by," said the 51-year-old, known as a strong feminist and campaigner against abuse of women.

The Vagina Monologues, which seeks to break down taboos about women and sex, has been performed in dozens of countries and at least 35 languages since 1996..

Reuters

Lonely Christmas for 50,000

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/printpage/0,5481,11669856,00.html

Herald Sun
13 December 2004

Lonely Christmas for 50,000

Christmas could prove a time of acute loneliness and distress for 50,000 newly separated or divorced men as they face the holiday alone for the first time.

Terry Melvin, manager of national telephone counselling service Mensline Australia, said staff were preparing for another onslaught of calls this yuletide.

Mr Melvin estimated about 50,000 Australian men will experience a first Christmas without their partners and, in many cases, their children.

"Traditionally, Christmas is about giving, sharing and spending time with the family," Mr Melvin said.

"But for men whose family has fallen apart, Christmas can be a time of acute loneliness, distress and even desperation.

"Some men have trouble coping for up to 10 years after separation."

More than 100,000 men called Mensline Australia during 2004.

The service is managed by Crisis Support Services, whose chief executive officer Wendy Sturgess said that before the Christmas holiday period, men often reported high anxiety over access issues.

"They are concerned they won't get to see their kids, and after Christmas we get a spate of calls from men who haven't been able to get access," Ms Sturgess said.

"We try to remind them that Christmas is one day of the year and a strong relationship with their children needs to be maintained throughout the whole year.

"We tell them, too, that not everyone has a picture postcard perfect Christmas and they are not alone. There are a lot of people who find Christmas a difficult time."

Ms Sturgess said Mensline would be staffed on Christmas Day.

Mr Melvin said an increasing number of men were realising that talking about their concerns and options could help them to better cope with their situation.

Which leaves Mensline Australia with a desperate need for more counsellors to answer the growing number of calls each year, he said.

Mensline is open 24 hours a day, seven days a week and provides anonymous support, information and referral for men dealing with family and relationship concerns.

The phone service is operated by paid and volunteer counsellors.

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,11669856%5E662,00.html